25.5 Compare and Contrast Non-Time-Value-Based Methods and Time-Value-Based Methods
Non-Time-Value-Based Methodsβ
-
Payback Period
- Focus: Liquidity
- Pros: Simple, highlights risk
- Cons: Ignores time value and cash flows after payback
-
Discounted Payback Period (hybrid)
- Accounts for time value but still ignores post-payback cash flows
-
Accounting Rate of Return (ARR)
- Focus: Accounting profitability
- Pros: Uses familiar accounting data
- Cons: Ignores time value, uses accounting profit not cash flow
Time-Value-Based Methodsβ
-
Net Present Value (NPV)
- Focus: Value creation
- Pros: Considers time value, cash flows, risk
- Cons: Requires accurate discount rate
-
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
- Focus: Rate of return
- Pros: Intuitive, considers time value
- Cons: Multiple IRRs possible, reinvestment assumption
-
Profitability Index (PI)
- Focus: Value per unit of investment
- Pros: Useful for capital rationing
- Cons: May conflict with NPV when comparing mutually exclusive projects
-
Discounted Payback
- Focus: Liquidity with time value
- Pros: Considers risk and time value
- Cons: Ignores cash flows after payback
Comparison Tableβ
| Method | Time Value | Cash Flow Focus | Decision Metric | Best Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payback | No | Cash inflows | Years to recover | Quick risk assessment |
| Discounted Payback | Yes | Cash inflows | Years to recover (discounted) | Liquidity with risk |
| ARR | No | Accounting profit | Percentage return | Simple performance measure |
| NPV | Yes | Cash flows | Monetary value | Primary decision metric |
| IRR | Yes | Cash flows | Rate of return | Supplement to NPV |
| PI | Yes | Cash flows | Ratio (benefit/cost) | Capital rationing |
Decision Frameworkβ
- Use payback/ARR for quick screening
- Use NPV/IRR/PI for final decisions
- Use discounted payback to assess risk/liquidity
- Consider qualitative factors throughout
Luxembourg Compliance Noteβ
In Luxembourg, SMEs often start with simple methods (payback, ARR) but banks and investors will expect NPV and IRR analysis for financing decisions. Capital budgeting analysis should also include sensitivity and scenario testing given market volatility.
Think It Throughβ
Can a project have a positive NPV but fail the payback test? Should it be accepted? Why or why not?